"Will this consortium offer constructive criticism and guidance?2
I belive that the intended members of this Forum would do that, they have been so doing for many, many years already. I'd say try and stop them.
"Will this consortium keep an open mind on any proposals that don't meet their 'vision'?"
As the Forum would be made of several groups, then they would have some open minds and their vision would/should be a democratic one.
"Will the consortium help get things like lottery funding even though the redevelopment doesn't meet their 'vision'?"
They would not be able to get lottery funding if they could not prove wich or need for their vision, in fact as Forums are not considered charitable they would be highly unlikely to be able to apply for funding. They are what they are debating/talking/information places. If they had a combined vision, they would decid which of their parts would be the lead funding applicant.
"Will this consortium listen to (or welcome the involvement of) regeneration experts such as the Prince's Regeneration Trust?"
I would think they would be silly not to listen to all sides of a story.
As to your last point, when you join with others you mostly have to bend you own plans a bit, but you do bring your knowledge to the table.
We don't know yet, if this will be formed and what it's terms of reference will be, a good time to join it is now while its still forming and you can influence the way it manages itself.
I'd like to throw my hat in the ring by suggesting that it's not just our built heritage that needs protecting and properly developing, or not, as the case may be.




