Author Topic: Libdem sulk.  (Read 223 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Steve Wakefield

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2319
  • Gender: Male
  • I claim my right to speak under article 10 of ECHR
Libdem sulk.
« on: December 13, 2011, 07:55:41 AM »

The press is leading with stories on Clegg having a sulk. What surprises me is as he is the MP who spoke up for his constituency or represented them yesterday in the debate in parliament? Did he put his own interest over those of his electorate?
All posts on this forum are my own and do not represent the views of any council political party or organisation.  :banana:

Offline ph1lc

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 398
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello !
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2011, 09:17:42 AM »

Not sure I see where you are coming from Steve.

Europe is an issue that crosses party lines. There are Eurosceptics in all the main parties, as indeed there are europhiles.

I'm 100% convinced that if there was a referendun on our membership we would leave.

Clegg is a europhile, Cameron not.

Online Steve Wakefield

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2319
  • Gender: Male
  • I claim my right to speak under article 10 of ECHR
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2011, 09:25:35 AM »

Clegg is a europhile, Cameron not.


Exactly, but I don't think it the way for an MP to behave. 
All posts on this forum are my own and do not represent the views of any council political party or organisation.  :banana:

Offline Geoff Reid

  • Active But Odd
  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7830
  • Gender: Male
  • "A Vile Gentleman" - Cllr Roderick Bluh
    • My Blog. Predictably Vile....
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2011, 01:05:04 PM »

Not sure I see where you are coming from Steve.

Europe is an issue that crosses party lines. There are Eurosceptics in all the main parties, as indeed there are europhiles.

I'm 100% convinced that if there was a referendun on our membership we would leave.

Clegg is a europhile, Cameron not.


I think the point Steve was making was that Nick Clegg absented himself from the House Of Commons over an EU issue when he should have been in the house representing his British constituents.

Maybe he had a good reason to be absent, but if that reason was unrelated to the veto spat then it seems sensible that he would have taken some trouble to explain his absence.  As it stands it does look like he's being mardy.

I agree with your referendum prediction.  I think we would leave, but remain convinced that very few Parliamentarians have the guts to give the electorate a referendum.

"The pen is mightier than the sword...." Edward Bulwer-Lytton, 1839.   "...And I know which I'd prefer to be stabbed with!" The Vile Gentleman, 2012.

Offline ph1lc

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 398
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello !
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2011, 01:16:06 PM »

Or maybe true to his principles.

Whilst I don't have much time for Nick Clegg, he plainly didn't agree with Cameron over the treaty/veto. He is fully entitled to his views.
It would have been pretty hypocritical to sit next to Cameron whilst Cameron was explaining his actions. It would most certainly have given the Labour benches something to shout about.

Perhaps his absense was diplomatic and well thought out given that his displeasure was so widely known.

Offline Bassettina

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 279
  • Hello !
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2011, 03:56:40 PM »

Cabinets big or small... if he was sat next to Cameron could/would he have spoken up for the people of Sheffield or nodded sheeplike like the rest of the front bench?


Online Steve Wakefield

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2319
  • Gender: Male
  • I claim my right to speak under article 10 of ECHR
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2011, 04:34:50 PM »

I agree with Geoff Clegg is being mardy and that is the problem I have with his stance. MPs are answerable to the house and should explain themselves there, not to the press or have we forgotten Nick Clegg is Deputy Primeminister?  Again I say it is no way to behave if you are the Deputy Primeminister and it begs the question are Libdems really equipped for government?

I think Bass makes a good point, the problem is we will never know the answer to that question as he was not there to represent them.
All posts on this forum are my own and do not represent the views of any council political party or organisation.  :banana:

Offline Geoff Reid

  • Active But Odd
  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7830
  • Gender: Male
  • "A Vile Gentleman" - Cllr Roderick Bluh
    • My Blog. Predictably Vile....
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2011, 05:19:49 PM »

Or maybe true to his principles.


Given that Mr Clegg seemed to abandon his previously highly-held principles regarding things like VAT and tuition fees when he entered Government, that seems unlikely :)
"The pen is mightier than the sword...." Edward Bulwer-Lytton, 1839.   "...And I know which I'd prefer to be stabbed with!" The Vile Gentleman, 2012.

Offline ph1lc

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 398
  • Gender: Male
  • Hello !
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2011, 06:33:24 PM »

Steve, how could Clegg have represented the people of Sheffield? You've been around long enough to know the process. Cameron was making a statement, Clegg could not have spoken. All he could have done is sit there to the insults from the front bench opposite. There was never going to be a division.

I appreciate you are a LABOUR Councillor, and a damned good one,  and as such you have to take a pop at the other parties wherever possible. I'm afraid that here there is no story.

I take Geoff's point about Cleggs principles, but Cameron would not have wanted Clegg there. I'm willing to bet that his absence was cooked up between them.
 
I've no time for the Liberal Democrats, but on this whole issue of last weeks summit Cameron could have done nothing else.

Online Steve Wakefield

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2319
  • Gender: Male
  • I claim my right to speak under article 10 of ECHR
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2011, 06:45:55 PM »

Steve, how could Clegg have represented the people of Sheffield? You've been around long enough to know the process. Cameron was making a statement, Clegg could not have spoken. All he could have done is sit there to the insults from the front bench opposite. There was never going to be a division.

I appreciate you are a LABOUR Councillor, and a damned good one,  and as such you have to take a pop at the other parties wherever possible. I'm afraid that here there is no story.

I take Geoff's point about Cleggs principles, but Cameron would not have wanted Clegg there. I'm willing to bet that his absence was cooked up between them.
 
I've no time for the Liberal Democrats, but on this whole issue of last weeks summit Cameron could have done nothing else.


Ph1lc

....But, it has made a thread discussion out of a thread topic and I had considered the possibility that they had cooked up Clegg's absence between them, so I am grateful that you mentioned it.  :santa_wink:
All posts on this forum are my own and do not represent the views of any council political party or organisation.  :banana:

Online Mart

  • Charter Member
  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3993
  • Maybe this world is another planet's hell.
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2011, 07:44:43 PM »

have we forgotten Nick Clegg is Deputy Primeminister?

Yes.
As the light changed from red to green to yellow and back to red again, I sat there thinking about life. Was it nothing more than a bunch of honking and yelling? Sometimes it seemed that way.

Got Signal

  • Guest
Re: Libdem sulk.
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2011, 08:03:03 PM »


Mart

I think you are right with that answer as Steve did ask a bleeding obvious question :santa_grin: